Programming in Java, 3'e. Programming in ANSI C, 4/e. Programming in BASIC, 3'e. Numerical Methods Object Oriented Prog. Sleight of. Mouth. The Magic of. Conversational Belief. Change by. Srinivas B. Dilts . ization, the Sleight of Mouth patterns have proved to be one Robert Dilts. Robert Dilts - Sleight of medical-site.info - Ebook download as PDF File .pdf) or view presentation slides online.
|Language:||English, Spanish, Arabic|
|Genre:||Science & Research|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Register to download]|
Robert Dilts Santa Cruz, California May, xiii Chapter 1 Language and Experience 2 SLEIGHT OF MOUTH LANGUAGE AND EXPERIENCE a The Magic. some patterns Robert Dilts coded from what Richard Bandler was doing. I was introduced and taught Sleight Of Mouth (SOM) as some 15 coded interventions. Author: Robert Dilts; Type: Downloadable PDF; Size: MB; Downloaded: times; Categories: NLP, Communication; Sleight of Mouth works with.
He is best known for his work on beliefs and strategies. He is also known for introducing many ideas of spirituality into NLP. He founded Behavioral Engineering - a software company in There he developed numerous education software programs.
Dilts graduated from UCSC in Robert Dilts studied under Bandler and Grinder since According to Marilyn Atkinson, founder of Erickson College, Dilts interpreted Gregory Bateson's work with logical levels which introduced the power of systemic thinking as a framework for asking great questions. Helene Aubrey, founder of the coach training school IDC in Switzerland, came to coaching after attending an NLP training program in California with Robert Dilts in when a classmate introduced her to coaching.
In Dilts wrote From Coach to Awakener and defined coaching as "the process of helping people and teams to perform at the peak of their abilities.
It involves drawing out people's strengths, helping them to bypass personal barriers and limits in order to achieve their personal best, and facilitating them to function more effectively as members of a team. Thus, effective coaching requires an emphasis on both task and relationship.
Dilts identifies two forms of coaching - executive coaching and life coaching referred to as capital "C". He also sees small "c" coaching as focused at the behavioral level of promoting conscious awareness of resources and abilities, and the development of conscious competence. He defines the competencies and skill set of capital "C" coaching as caretaking, guiding, coaching, teaching, mentoring, sponsoring, and awakening.
Even though Bandler was applying these patterns "negatively" to make his point. They can be characterized as "verbal reframes" which influ- ence beliefs, and the mental maps from which beliefs have been formed. In the nearly twenty years since their formal- ization, the Sleight of Mouth patterns have proved to be one of the most powerful sets of distinctions provided by NLP for effective persuasion. Perhaps more than any other distinc- tions in NLP, these patterns provide a tool for conversational belief change.
There are challenges in teaching these patterns effectively, however, because they are about words, and words are fundamentally abstract. As NLP acknowledges, words are surface structures which attempt to represent or express deeper structures.
In order to truly understand and cre- atively apply a particular language pattern, we must inter- nalize its 'deeper structure'. Otherwise, we are simply mimicking or "parroting" the examples we have been given. Thus, in learning and practicing Sleight of Mouth, it is important to distinguish genuine magic from trivial 'tricks'.
The magic of change comes from tapping into something that goes beyond the words themselves. Until now, the Sleight of Mouth patterns have typically been taught by presenting learners with definitions and a number of verbal examples illustrating the various linguistic structures.
Learners are left to intuitively figure out the deeper structure necessary to generate the patterns on their own.
While, in some ways, this mirrors the way that we learned our own native language as children, it can also present certain limitations. For instance, people especially non-native speakers of En- glish have experienced the Sleight of Mouth patterns as powerful and useful, but at times they can be somewhat complex and confusing. Even Practitioners of NLP including those with many years of experience are not always clear about how these patterns fit together with other NLP distinctions.
It's also a nice learning to come up against the situation that you can't handle — and then later think it over, and realize that, too, was a learning that's useful in many, many different ways. It allows you to assess your strength. It also allows you to discover the areas in which you need to use some more of your own security, which rests within yourself.
Reacting to the good and the bad, and dealing with it adequately — that's the real joy in life. Erickson's statement is an example of applying the Sleight of Mouth pattern of Another Outcome.
The comment trans- forms what might be considered "failure" with respect to one outcome handling the situation , into feedback with respect to another outcome "reacting to the good and the bad, and dealing with it adequately'.
Handling the situation Reacting to the good and the bad, and dealing with it adeq uately Changing the Outcome Shifts the Frame of What is Relevant and Successful. Think of a situation in which you feel stuck, frustrated or a failure. What is the negative generalization or judgment that you have made about yourself or others with respect to that situation, and what outcome or outcomes are im- plied by that judgment?
Not speaking up for myself means that I am a coward. Outcome s: To make myself speak up for myself, and be strong and brave. Explore the impact it would have on your perception of the situation if you thought about it with respect to some other possible outcomes as well - e. For instance, if the outcome were switched to "treat- ing myself and others with respect," or "treating others the way I would like to be treated," judging. What is another outcome that you could add to or substitute for your current outcome that would make your negative generalization or judgment less relevant, and make it easier to view the current consequences of this situation as feedback rather than failure?
Alternative Outcome s: From the NLP perspective, switching to another outcome serves to "reframe" our perception of the experience. Reframing literally means to put a new or different frame around some image or experi- ence.
Psychologically, to "reframe" something means to trans- form its meaning by putting it into a different framework or context than it has previously been perceived. The frame around a picture is a good metaphor for under- standing the concept and process of reframing.
Depending on what is framed in a picture, we will have different informa- tion about the content of the picture, and thus a different perception of what the picture represents. A photographer or painter who is recording a particular landscape, for example, might only "frame" a tree, or choose to include an entire meadow with many trees, animals and perhaps a stream or pond.
This determines what an observer of the picture will see of the original scene at a later time. Furthermore, a person who has downloadd a particular picture might subse- quently decide to change the frame so that it fits more esthetically in a particular room of the house.
Similarly, because they determine what we "see" and perceive with respect to a certain experience or event, psy- chological frames influence the way we experience and inter- pret a situation. As an illustration, consider for a moment the following picture. Small Frame.
Notice how your experience and understanding of the situa- tion being represented is widened to include a new perspec- tive. Larger Frame The first picture does not have much "meaning" per se.
It is simply of a "fish" of some type. When the frame is widened to produce the second picture, we suddenly see a different situation. The first fish is not simply a "fish," it is a "little fish about to be eaten by a big fish. Notice what happens when we "reframe" the situation again by widening our perspective even more.
By changing the frame size, we see that it is not only the little fish who is in danger. The big fish is also about to be eaten by an even bigger fish. In his quest to survive, the big fish has become so focused on eating the little fish that it is oblivious to the fact that its own survival is threatened by the much bigger fish.
The situation depicted here, and the new level of aware- ness that comes from reframing our perspective of the situation, is a good metaphor for both the process and purpose of psychological reframing. People frequently end up in the situation of the little fish, or of the fish in the middle.