Michael Tuchscherer - Reactive Training medical-site.info Download ( MB) · English · 日本語 · Português (Brazil) · Deutsch · Русский · Français · Svenska. Tuscherer Reactive Training Manual - Free download as PDF File . pdf) or read online for free. Entrenamiento fuerza. Tuscherer Reactive Training Manual. August 18, | Author: Jose B Snchz | Category: N/A Invalid or corrupted PDF file. More Information.
|Language:||English, Spanish, Dutch|
|Genre:||Children & Youth|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Register to download]|
Notes on Reactive Training Manual. Nathan Beckmann. August 26, 1 The Basic Template. Template. Monday. • Equipped squat variation / raw squat. Best for people who: Want to understand RTS -Learn best by reading -Want a jump start to Auto-Regulated training (i.e. listening to your body). This is Mike. After reading several of the posts it seems that much has evolved from the RTS manual. Everything from RPEs to the percentage chart.
So, for example, if you did five reps and felt like you had one in the tank that would be an RPE 9; if you did five reps and felt like you had two in the tank that would be an RPE 8; if you did five reps and felt like you had three in the tank, that would be an RPE 7 and so on and so forth.
Why is RPE important? Well, RPE allows us to extrapolate intensity from any given work set. Using this data, we can fairly accurately estimate a daily 1RM one rep max. This works in both directions. Intensity relationship chart used in RTS: If I tell a lifter to do x5x5 for their workout on Monday, we can accurately calculate volume: We now know the normative volume would then be: We could then compare this normalized value to other scenarios with higher or lower intensity.
However, none of this information tells us anything about what this actually did to the lifter. For others who are well conditioned, it may not even be enough to produce an adaptation. In fact, even for the exact same lifter, on some days, this load may constitute too much work for effective training and, on other days, it may be too little.
For example, their workout might call for x5 9 which would simply mean that they need to work up to a set of 5 with one left in the tank. Fatigue percents can now enter the picture. For example: Instead of just guessing at the effect the volume we prescribe is having, with fatigue percents, we can be sure the lifter is accumulating the exact amount of stress that is desired.
For well-conditioned athletes who are having an amazing day, they may end up doing ten sets to get that same level of fatigue. Regardless, the volume prescription has the intended effect and is completely autoregulated based on what is happening during the actual training session!
If a lifter is young and adaptable, they may have to work up to a lbs PR in order to hit their prescribed RPE. Imagine any circumstance you want.
And with fatigue percents in play, volume is controlled in much the same manner. The single biggest problem with the RTS system is that it introduces the element of potential user error. With RTS, a lifter must be simultaneously brutally honest and hungry for improvement. You need to be as objective as possible in rating your RPEs. Of course, being able to accurately rate RPE is also a skill set that is developed with practice.
With any new system, there is an adjustment period. To successfully wield the RTS system requires both physical and mental strength. As much as it pains me to say this, I actually do not recommend that you start off with the RTS Manual. All of the information you need to successfully run the program is available on the Reactive Training Systems article section.
Now, this thing is jam-packed with information.
There is almost zero fluff. But as I said, most of the information in the book is now available for free on the internet.
As of lately it seems that block periodization is no longer the standard. This seems like an autoregulated version of Bulgarian Method My question is, how do you personally implement RTS into your training and what is the current 'standard', assuming there even is one?
No response in 2 days?!? This is a little concerning: Good question.
Originally Posted by GR It's been been kind of disappointing that this forum seems to have died For me, it's mostly just stay shy of failure, and if sets are too getting too close to failure and I want more quality volume, drop the weight a little. Originally Posted by j I still rate my sets with RPE It appears all RTS cares about now is getting people plugged into paid programming.
Originally Posted by thatcreepyguy.