Edited by leading figures in the field, this handbook gives an overview of the current status of cognition and emotion research by giving the. Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. Edited by T. Dalgleish and M. Power. (Pp. ;. £) Wiley: Chichester. The first thing to say about this book is. Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. Edited by Tim Dalgleish and Mick J. Power Copyright 48 downloads Views 46MB Size Report. DOWNLOAD PDF.
|Language:||English, Spanish, Portuguese|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Register to download]|
"This superb handbook delivers all that it promises. Robinson, Watkins, and Harmon-Jones have brought together the top international researchers in the field to. Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. Edited by. Tim Dalgleish. MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences, Cambridge, UK and. Mick J. Power. Department of. Cognition and emotion: reviews of current research and theories / edited by Jan Dalgleish & M. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. Б.
These results may seem at odds with predictions from the emotion regulation literature, indicating that reappraisal is more efficient than suppression in reducing negative emotions for review see Gross, , and their biases on decision making Heilman et al.
These studies generally support the view that emotion regulation plays an important role in moral decision making. However, recent progresses in moral psychology and the emotion regulation literature suggest several interesting avenues for future research.
Therefore, fewer deontological choices imply more utilitarian choices in moral dilemmas. However, we prefer to describe the effect of reappraisal in relation to level of deontological choices in order to suggest that reappraisal reduces emotionally driven deontological biases in moral decision making.
However, moral dilemmas describe extreme situations with artificially limited choices, which may seem improbable to participants. The credibility of moral dilemmas may be increased by drawing attention to similar situations from reality e.
Therefore, future studies on emotion and emotion regulation must increasingly consider other measures of moral decision making. Another issue that could be tackled by future studies is related to understanding the multidimensional and dynamic relations between emotional experience and moral decision making.
Participants report multiple emotions in moral dilemmas, some of which e. The presence of multiple emotions suggests that they may play different roles in decision making, signalling potential transgressions of norms and enhancing motivational comparisons between alternative courses of action Cushman et al.
In addition, emotional experience may change during the decision making process, from the initial moral appraisal of the situation and throughout deliberation to settling on a response. The choice of emotion regulation strategies and their efficiency may be crucial in the success of this transition. These timely results extend Bridging Cognition and Emotion in Moral Decision Making 11 to moral psychology a topic that only recently emerged in the emotion regulation literature.
Therefore, future studies might investigate emotion regulation choice and efficiency at varying stages in the moral decision making process. Finally, future studies might describe atypical patterns of moral decision making in psychiatric conditions. Research on psychopathy and antisocial traits has uncovered important links between emotion and moral decision making e. Emotion regulation failures i. In conclusion, research on emotion regulation has rapidly developed and increased our understanding of the interplay between emotion and cognition in moral decision making.
Inspired by the exuberant literature on emotion regulation, this line of research will probably continue to expand, with important implications for cognitive psychology and neuroscience. The mismeasure of morals: antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas.
Cognition, 1 , — Revisiting external validity: Concerns about trolley problems and other sacrificial dilemmas in moral psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9, — Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 10, — Miu Blanchette, I. The influence of affect on higher level cognition: A review of research on interpretation, judgement, decision making and reasoning. Anomalies: Ultimatums, dictators and manners.
Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9 2 , — A constructionist review of morality and emotions: No evidence for specific links between moral content and discrete emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Review. Who makes utilitarian judgments?
The influences of emotions on utilitarian judgments. Judgment and Decision Making, 6 7 , — Christensen, J. Moral judgment reloaded: A moral dilemma validation study.
Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Moral dilemmas in cognitive neuroscience of moral decision-making: A principled review.
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36 4 , — Selective deficit in personal moral judgment following damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex.
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2 2 , 84— Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5 1 , 59— Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: A process dissociation approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2 , — Validity and reliability of the Experience Sampling Method.
Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, , — Cushman, F. Simulating murder: The aversion to harmful action. Emotion, 12 1 , 2—7. Finding faults: How moral dilemmas illuminate cognitive structure. Social Neuroscience, 7 3 , — Our multi-system moral psychology: Towards a consensus view. Doris, G. Harman, S. Nichols, J. Prinz, W. Stich Eds. Elam, S. Liberating reason from the passions: Overriding intuitionist moral judgments through emotion reappraisal.
Psychological Science, 23 7 , — The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23 3 , — Moral Foundations Theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55— Graham, J.
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96 5 , — Mapping the moral domain.
Emotion and cognition in moral judgment: Evidence from neuroimaging. Changeux, A. Damasio, W. Christen Eds. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Greene, J. Sinnott-Armstrong Ed. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45 3 , — The Cognitive Neuroscience of Moral Judgment.
Gazzaniga Ed. The rise of moral cognition. Cognition, , 39— Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 3 , — The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44 2 , — An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, , — How and where does moral judgment work?
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6 12 , — Gross, J. The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2 3 , — Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences.
Psychophysiology, 39 3 , — S Gross, J. Emotion regulation: Taking stock and moving forward. Emotion, 13 3 , — Emotion regulation: Conceptual and empirical foundations. Gross Ed. New York, NY: Guilford. Clinical Psychological Science, 2 4 , — Miu Gross, J. Emotion generation and emotion regulation: A distinction we should make carefully. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 4 , — The emotional dog does learn new tricks: A reply to Pizarro and Bloom Psychological Review, 1 , — The new synthesis in moral psychology.
Sexual morality: The cultures and emotions of conservatives and liberals. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31 1 , — Neural correlates of regulating negative emotions related to moral violations.
NeuroImage, 30 1 , — Emotion regulation and decision making under risk and uncertainty. Emotion, 10 2 , — Beyond dual-processes: The interplay of reason and emotion in moral judgment. Clausen Eds. Netherlands: Springer. Morality in everyday life. Emotions as moral amplifiers: An appraisal tendency approach to the influences of distinct emotions upon moral judgment. Emotion Review, 3 3 , — The moral emotions: A social-functionalist account of anger, disgust, and contempt.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4 , — More than a feeling: Counterintuitive effects of compassion on moral judgment. Sytsma Ed. London: Bloomsbury. Jamieson, J. Turning the knots in your stomach into bows: Reappraising arousal improves performance on the GRE. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46 1 , — Foundations of the metaphysics of morals. Indiannapolis: Bobbs-Merril. Koenigs, M. Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements.
Nature, , — Essays on moral development.
The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice. Landy, J. Does incidental disgust amplify moral judgment? A meta-analytic review of experimental evidence. Perspectives on Psychological Science. Poker-faced morality: Concealing emotions leads to utilitarian decision making.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, , 49— Moral Dilemmas.
Philosophical Review, 71 2 , — Lowenstein, G. The role of affect in decision making. Davidson, K. Goldsmith Eds. Oxford University Press. Martin, R. Cognitive emotion regulation in the prediction of depression, anxiety, stress, and anger. Personality and Individual Differences, 39 7 , — Atypical moral judgment following traumatic brain injury. Judgment and Decision Making, 7 4 , — Mauss, I. The tie that binds? Coherence among emotion experience, behavior, and physiology.
Emotion, 5 2 , — Conflict monitoring in cognition-emotion competition. In Handbook of emotion regulation pp.
McGuire, J. Crisp Ed. London: Routledge. Aversive for me, wrong for you: First-person behavioral aversions underlie the moral condemnation of harm.
Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7 10 , — Miu, A. Cognitive reappraisal reduces the susceptibility to the framing effect in economic decision making. Personality and Individual Differences, 51 4 , — Anxiety and decision-making: Toward a neuroeconomics perspective. Moral judgments, emotions and the utilitarian brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11 8 , — The neural basis of moral cognition: Sentiments, concepts, and values.
This handbook reflects the latest work being carried out by the key people in the field. Reviews "This book is an important reference for use by researchers in cognition and emotion and will be of value to anyone who has interests that overlap this area Free Access. Summary PDF Request permissions.
Tools Get online access For authors. Email or Customer ID. Forgot password? Old Password. New Password. Your password has been changed. Returning user.